Because I'm an industry professional and I keep an eye on these things. I literally don't own a single Apple product. My daily driver is a Framework with a midrange Tiger Lake in it. In this very thread, I've said a bunch of things about how Zen5 is a solid gen when others were throwing around...
I don't get it either. (I also don't get why ARM went from 2 to 4 imul's in X925.)
Profiling has shown over and over again that the vast majority of multiplies executed are by constants, which shouldn't be lowered to imul anyway. Relatively few of the ones that aren't by constants are...
Congrats! You're comparing a machine with 5 or 6 P-cores and 6 E-cores to one with a minimum of ten P-cores and 4 E-cores and declaring there's no way the latter has higher MT perf.
Completely unrelated, to anyone following along who wants to improve their reading comprehension, there are a lot...
Comrade, what are you talking about?
By your own link, M3 does ~3100 GB6 ST native. The virtualized submission above was 2697.
By your own link, M3 Pro - not Max - does 14412 with 11 cores (5 P, 6 E). The virtualized NT/ARM submission does 16165. This may have something to do with the fact...
But since you ask so nicely...
https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/3463014
Note that the MT score here is for only 12 cores, not the full 14-16; it is unclear which ones are passed through to the guest.
And, for a comparison, the highest performing Meteor Lake ST result I could find in five...
Er, this isn't a controversial statement????? Why would it run at anything less? There's a little bit of overhead with virt, especially I/O, but not much.
Win/ARM runs fine on ARM Macs in virtualization.
You seem weirdly hacked off at the Mac for being... well... the Mac. Like, it mostly runs MacOS and is going to keep mostly running MacOS for the foreseeable future.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.