Log in
Register
Menu
Install the app
Install
Home
Featured
Forums
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
SarahKerrigan
Senior member
Messages
375
Featured content
0
Profile views
292
Reaction score
539
Points
136
Joined
Oct 12, 2014
Find
Find content
Find all content by SarahKerrigan
Find all threads by SarahKerrigan
Latest activity
Postings
Featured content
About
Trophies
SarahKerrigan
replied to the thread
Discussion
Future ARM Cortex + Neoverse µArchs Discussion
.
Do you know if there are any docs available? I looked it up and only saw stuff from what seemed like very dubious blogs and "news"...
Yesterday at 5:18 PM
SarahKerrigan
replied to the thread
Discussion
Future ARM Cortex + Neoverse µArchs Discussion
.
Huh. What's a Lingxi?
Yesterday at 12:26 PM
SarahKerrigan
reacted to
SpudLobby's post
in the thread
Discussion
Qualcomm Snapdragon Thread
with
Like
.
People have to stop being so neurotic. Even Qualcomm’s own graphs still have them ahead of AMD/Intel on ST efficiency and with a much...
Friday at 1:05 PM
SarahKerrigan
replied to the thread
Discussion
Qualcomm Snapdragon Thread
.
Yep. We'll know in weeks. I don't think we'd be seeing the level of OEM interest that we are if the situation were as bad as some here...
Friday at 11:41 AM
SarahKerrigan
reacted to
Hitman928's post
in the thread
Discussion
Qualcomm Snapdragon Thread
with
Like
.
He doesn’t say it’s entirely wrong but that the info is misinterpreted and the portrayal is wrong. Not sure what that means though...
Friday at 10:13 AM
SarahKerrigan
reacted to
gdansk's post
in the thread
Discussion
Qualcomm Snapdragon Thread
with
Like
.
This is a good naming scheme. Take note AMD: generation means generation not release year.
Wednesday at 1:44 PM
SarahKerrigan
replied to the thread
Discussion
Qualcomm Snapdragon Thread
.
It would be disappointing if only on-package memory is available, since that would mean CAMM2 upgrades aren't happening.
Wednesday at 12:10 PM
SarahKerrigan
reacted to
Ghostsonplanets's post
in the thread
Discussion
Qualcomm Snapdragon Thread
with
Like
.
Every modern APU has unified memory?
Wednesday at 12:02 PM
SarahKerrigan
replied to the thread
Discussion
Qualcomm Snapdragon Thread
.
"Highly specialized silicon more efficient than highly generalized silicon - Film at 11" Codec blocks will show the same trend
Wednesday at 10:20 AM
SarahKerrigan
reacted to
Ghostsonplanets's post
in the thread
Discussion
Qualcomm Snapdragon Thread
with
Like
.
Meh. Too much focus on AI. I wanted to see starting prices for Snap X Plus machines and performance in real workloads.
Wednesday at 9:49 AM
SarahKerrigan
replied to the thread
Discussion
Qualcomm Snapdragon Thread
.
Charlie says a lot of things. Release is close enough that it will soon become very clear whether they're true or not. Considering he...
Wednesday at 9:45 AM
SarahKerrigan
replied to the thread
Discussion
Qualcomm Snapdragon Thread
.
IBM may have patented some implementation details, but the concept has been done before by others - TileGX, for instance, had a "virtual...
Wednesday at 9:37 AM
SarahKerrigan
replied to the thread
Discussion
Qualcomm Snapdragon Thread
.
Most apps total? Sure. Most apps by number of installs? I'm not so confident. The Win/ARM software ecosystem has improved quite a bit.
Tuesday at 1:07 PM
SarahKerrigan
replied to the thread
Discussion
Qualcomm Snapdragon Thread
.
The revolution that was hyped up was more for the Elite, FWIW, and performance for that part continues to look very solid. The Plus is a...
Tuesday at 11:32 AM
SarahKerrigan
reacted to
Gideon's post
in the thread
Discussion
Qualcomm Snapdragon Thread
with
Like
.
The MT numbers beat it by a very decent amount (10 big cores really is great) but the ST numbers are actually about the same...
Tuesday at 11:30 AM
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
RESOURCES
Advertising
Cookies Policies
Privacy
Term & Conditions
FOLLOW
Facebook
Twitter
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
sale-70-410-exam
|
Exam-200-125-pdf
|
we-sale-70-410-exam
|
hot-sale-70-410-exam
|
Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps
|
Dumps-98-363-exams-date
|
Certs-200-125-date
|
Dumps-300-075-exams-date
|
hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book
|
Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam
|
Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?
|
hot-sale-book-200-125-book
|
Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam
|
Dumps-210-260-exams-date
|
Download-200-125-Exam-PDF
|
Exam-Description-300-101-dumps
|
Certs-300-101-date
|
Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam
|
Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps
|
Exam-Description-200-125-dumps
|
Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam
|
hot-sale-book-210-260-book
|
Dumps-200-901-exams-date
|
Certs-200-901-date
|
Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps
|
Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam
|
Certs-CSSLP-date
|
100%-Pass-70-383-Exams
|
Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions
|
100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions
|
Dumps-300-135-exams-date
|
Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams
|
Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam
|
Download-300-070-Exam-PDF
|
Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam
|
100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams
|
100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions
|
Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date
|
Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps
|
Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps
|
Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date
|
2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam
|
100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions
|
Pass-4A0-100-Exam
|
Latest-4A0-100-Questions
|
Dumps-98-365-exams-date
|
2017-Latest-98-365-Exam
|
100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams
|
2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam
|
Dumps-200-355-exams-date
|
2017-Latest-300-320-Exam
|
Pass-300-101-Exam
|
100%-Pass-300-115-Exams
|
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/
|
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/
|