Kudos to him for simulating a 7600X3D!
For me, the summary of the video seems to be, 7900X3D is bad value. 5800X3D, while hated by Hogwarts and Spiderman games, generally punches above its weight class and often beats the 7950X, especially in minimum fps so smoother gameplay.
I do think that instead of a 7600X3D, AMD should create a 7700X3D with the same clocks as a 7600X or slightly higher, just enough to not cannibalize sales of its 7800X3D, so people have a good and cheap reason to go with AM5 instead of getting the older AM4/5800X3D if building a new gaming system. 7700X3D also because 8C/16T seems to be what most current and future games are making good use of.
Looking at german retailer Mindfactory s sales there s a clear trend.
AM5 MBs sell about 2x more than AM4, but AM5 CPUs sell only 10% more than AM4 ones, so it look that an overhelmingly majority of AM4 CPUs are sold to people who already own an AM4 system and are upgrading the CPU to replace a previous Zen 1-2 CPU.
This is obvious when one notice that the more sought AM4 CPUs are the 5800X/5800X3D/5700X, the ones who make new builds are likely doing so to get the lower possible price for a whole PC and are mainly buying 5700X/5600/5600X/5600G parts.
At the bottom of the market the CPU + 32GB RAM + MB price difference amount to 150-160€ lower price for an AM4, that s about the cost, if not more, of all other parts for a whole PC.
Edit : I forgot the GPU for whom look for games, the most sold "cheap" GPUs are in order the 6800/3060/6600/6750XT/6650XT/7600, guess that the lowish AM4 CPUs i mentioned can easily drive those cards.