I assume that was a case I had been following.
Kind of telling that you had to go back 8 years to find something, and some pretty good sleuthing on your part. Which leads me to ask, why is this so important to you?
I assume that was a case I had been following.So JD50 quoted the relevant post. Seems like you were very comfortable reaching conclusions based on far less complete information in that case. Can you explain the difference?
Page 23 - Development on Clinton Email Probe?
Page 23 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.forums.anandtech.com
I assume that was a case I had been following.
Kind of telling that you had to go back 8 years to find something, and some pretty good sleuthing on your part. Which leads me to ask, why is this so important to you?
I didn’t do any sleuthing - it was quoted to me. I’m sure I can find plenty of other cases though.I assume that was a case I had been following.
Kind of telling that you had to go back 8 years to find something, and some pretty good sleuthing on your part. Which leads me to ask, why is this so important to you?
My guess is that if it were only you they believe can support a Republican party lead by an obvious fascist authoritarian Mafia like criminal, they wouldn’t care, but what they see in you they see in millions of other Americans and that means Trump might get re-elected and turn the country into more of a fascist state than it already is.I assume that was a case I had been following.
Kind of telling that you had to go back 8 years to find something, and some pretty good sleuthing on your part. Which leads me to ask, why is this so important to you?
Because I haven't been following the case. I catch a little bit here and a little bit on the far right forums, and as expected they proclaim with hard facts that Trump is innocent, just as vehemently as you fellows proclaim his guilt.
Btw, I don't see danks posts, he's on my do not disturb list. I can anyone that isn't civil. If someone can't express an opinion without insults and anger they have nothing worth saying.
I assume that was a case I had been following.
Kind of telling that you had to go back 8 years to find something, and some pretty good sleuthing on your part. Which leads me to ask, why is this so important to you?
Interesting take on the subject, but I have to disagree with most of it. It really is just simple tribalism, and the need for vindication. In the end I'm going to be disappointed no mater which of the dismal choices wins, which is probably why I haven't paid much attention to either.My guess is that if it were only you they believe can support a Republican party lead by an obvious fascist authoritarian Mafia like criminal, they wouldn’t care, but what they see in you they see in millions of other Americans and that means Trump might get re-elected and turn the country into more of a fascist state than it already is.
Your kind terrifies them. In my opinion fskimospy respects the power of logic and facts and presents them to you on tat plane. What I try to tell you is that the reason that his arguments are difficult for you is because you have confused real truth with truth you were conditioned to substitute for it.
That is what happened to me. I had to believe there is a good because nothing could be more obvious. We have sensory perception that tells us some things hurt and some things feel good. But we can be conditioned as children to believe that some things are evil that are good and some things that are good are evil. Once that happens we are fucked. We now have sacred cows that if we abandon we feel the truth there is a good dies with them.
I am here to tell you that is what happened to me. I lost everything I held sacred and fell into misery, hopelessness, and despair. Then I had an experience that left me knowing at last what is left after losing everything that can be taken. There is only love. Have no fear. Let go. To be empty within is to become a mirror in which god is reflected, who you where born to be.
Liar. Complete and utter liar. Go suck the orange cream out of the orange turd your feckless magat troll. You don’t fool anyone. You will only be disappointed if your orange turd loses. Dismal choices? 😂 patheticInteresting take on the subject, but I have to disagree with most of it. It really is just simple tribalism, and the need for vindication. In the end I'm going to be disappointed no mater which of the dismal choices wins, which is probably why I haven't paid much attention to either.
Was it tribalism when you said you believed Clinton to be guilty?Interesting take on the subject, but I have to disagree with most of it. It really is just simple tribalism, and the need for vindication. In the end I'm going to be disappointed no mater which of the dismal choices wins, which is probably why I haven't paid much attention to either.
Interesting take on the subject, but I have to disagree with most of it. It really is just simple tribalism, and the need for vindication. In the end I'm going to be disappointed no mater which of the dismal choices wins, which is probably why I haven't paid much attention to either.
Trump is being prosecuted because there is enough evidence to convince multiple grand juries that there is a reasonable probability that he has committed multiple crimes.
There should be no literal “Get out of Jail” card just because he’s running for President. If you have bought into the conspiracy from too much right-wing media that the legal system is being used to circumvent electoral process.... Even if convicted, Trump can still run for president. There’s even a historic precedent. It’s not stopping him from running for office. Trump is a perpetual victim and all he seems to know how to do is whine. I guess some people find that compelling but personally I don’t understand why anyone would follow a person who claims to be so powerless and being ruled by emotion.
It's amazing these people can get sucked down so many rabbit holes. Biden is weak, old and stupid, BUT ...He can arrange several show trials for his opponent. Political interference all the way because while Trump is innocent, it’s just that easy to make him look guilty for things he admits on TV that he has done that are against the law except unless HE does them. Judges answer to their clerks and daughters and mysterious Democratic operatives working in the shadows. Everything is rigged and Donald J. Trump is the last victimized honest man on earth. For the documents case alone he should be imprisoned at a CIA black site. For threatening the families of various court officials repeatedly he should be held.
I don’t understand why the Republicans would even think about running a candidate like Trump unless it is some secret plot to use the 25th Amendment on him once he is in office. Republicans already got what they needed out of him. They would be way better off to dump his ass, run a candidate who actually has some ideas and policies (beyond putting people he deems undesirable in cages) and who can speak plain English without descending into word salad delivered in a tone of baby talk. But let’s see what he looks like six months from now. Six more months of him plummeting from that cognitive cliff that he has already gone over should make it a lot more clear to every concerned voter that he does not pack the gear to serve as POTUS, now or ever.
Yes, I agree but you seem to hold a different opinion on the appropriateness of that. I belong to a tribe of people that brought forth on the continent a nation conceived in liberty and dedicated to the principle that all men are created equal and that they be subject to the rule of law and not mob vengeance of the capricious judgment of kings. In this way and in this way only, via the judgment of ones peers, shall vindication for criminal actions be met out. You seem to have fallen victim to some form of skepticism as to the appropriateness of that. As I have told you many times, I believe that the very fine value that detests haste of judgment owing to suspected bias behind it must be tempered by wisdom, the recognition that it isn't only hatred that impels a wish to see justice done. Under oppression and without resistance to it life becomes intolerable.Interesting take on the subject, but I have to disagree with most of it. It really is just simple tribalism, and the need for vindication. In the end I'm going to be disappointed no mater which of the dismal choices wins, which is probably why I haven't paid much attention to either.
Does it have to be proven that he knew he was specifically running afoul of campaign finance laws, or just that he knew he was using his own money?The Prosecutor also has to prove intent. That Trump knew that his arraignment with Cohen violated campaign finance laws. I think the prosecutor has more than proven that Trump falsified business records which is a misdemeanor with what has been presented to the jury. The connection that he knowingly violated campaign finance laws when he used his personal money to send those payments in my opinion hasn't been proven in court.(Criminal conspiracy for the election) It will be interesting to see if the jury is presented with the possibility of convicting on the misdemeanor or if the Defense and Prosecutor go with only keeping the felony count when instructions are presented to the jury(Judge could decide to also add the lesser charges). Personally I think Trump is guilty of all of it but with what has been presented in court, I am not sure if the prosecutor made enough of a case for the Criminal conspiracy charge to stick, based on the standard of beyond a reasonable doubt. Out of all the criminal cases against Trump, I always viewed this as the weakest case. So far with what has been presented in court, my view hasn't changed.
Does it have to be proven that he knew he was specifically running afoul of campaign finance laws, or just that he knew he was using his own money?
If I knowingly speed in a construction zone, is it necessary to prove I knew I was in a construction zone to fine/charge me as such? Or just that I knew I was speeding?
Does it have to be proven that he knew he was specifically running afoul of campaign finance laws, or just that he knew he was using his own money?
If I knowingly speed in a construction zone, is it necessary to prove I knew I was in a construction zone to fine/charge me as such? Or just that I knew I was speeding?
A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.
Yes, it would have been easier and legal had he just paid the $150k - of course the entire reason he decided to commit a crime instead was because he (correctly) figured it would have cost him the election.Lol stupid former lawyer but still orange monkey butt kisser. Anchor asks wouldn’t it have been easier and no legal problem if he just paid the $150k directly instead of paying back $420k? Dumb lawyer, Well it proves Cohen is a crook!!!
Context for those of us not following the absolute minute-by-minute details of the case?
Cohen made a call to Schiller so he could talk to the orange monkey to say it’s been handled. Defence pointed out Cohen was dealing with a 14 year old prank calling him and there was a text just before, call me now. So they say a 90 second call isn’t long enough to bitch about the prank call and then talk about the hush money.Context for those of us not following the absolute minute-by-minute details of the case?