mikeymikec
Lifer
- May 19, 2011
- 19,943
- 14,215
- 136
PB was an interesting/different flick, CoR and Riddick were definitely an "established formula".LOVED Pitch Black. Enjoyed Riddick, but it wasn't a fun B-movie anymore. Went from 23M to 110M budget between movies. Apparently there was a third one?
“Riddick”: A rehash of “Pitch Black”?
In the year 2000, “Pitch Black” was released to modest reviews, and was (next to “The Fast and The Furious”) one of the more popular movies to thrust actor Vin Diesel into the spotlight. A sequel, “The Chronicles of Riddick” was released in 2004, again receiving modest reviews. On Sept. 6, 2013...www.theskylineview.com
I disagree that Riddick (ie. the third movie) was a rehash of PB though. A major plot element of the third film is regarding a character from the first, so of course it's a bit self-referential, but the only way to define it as a rehash would involve distilling the second half of the first movie and two thirds of the third movie into like 5 words. It's like saying that Aliens is a rehash of Alien because an alien is hunting them *again*. There are definitely similarities and a repeated element between PB and Riddick, sure.
Riddick in PB is meant to be very ambiguous in intent: sometimes creepy as fuck, sometimes he has a decent streak, it was a nice change from most films of that era, possibly most modern films. CoR and Riddick both feature a more Tom Cruise'y predictable Hollywood stereotype version of Riddick. I prefer 1 and 3 over 2 I think but I like all three enough to own the lot on BR.
IMO for there to be a worthwhile fourth movie (which is in the words apparently, called 'Furya'), they're going to have to change things up a bit.