No, definitely. Just in general about the CPU. It’s okay to just agree btw.Sort of.
It’s great.It's ok.
yeah AMD still can’t get the XPS. Check out Brutus’s comments about this — he makes good points.Only Dell really committed. Rest are so-so.
Reddit is such a cheap target when half of them are wanking to AMD. If it were Nvidia you’d have a point (though hell, AMD GPUs do suck so they’re justified in wanking to GeForce).It's kinda mid for how much reddit wanks it, plus they missed clk targets in public!
I don’t agree but it’s true it’s the meta. Everyone’s pumping. Straight up Venice Beach roids with watts rn.
You think 3300? Might be fair, IDK. Did they get any IPC gains outside of SME or no?
Right now it looks like Zen 5 might not pass Apple which I was previously looking forward to.
I have a feeling Apple will only upgrade the NPU tho. A18 is everything that M4 but a faster NPU. Same CPU cores and GPU cores etcTrue. But it’ll just be the M4 core I bet.
Totally agreeI have a feeling Apple will only upgrade the NPU tho. A18 is everything that M4 but a faster NPU. Same CPU cores and GPU cores etc
Yeah 3300 is very low considering it scores 2700 with enough cooling in GB5. It’s a very impressive score in 5.3300 is a ridiculous take. He knows he's spouting bs since people have posted actual calculations without SME, but he's got his anti Apple agenda he wants to push.
4 more months till Apple CPU team is dead, starts again on Twitter. lolTotally agree
na. just ok.It’s great.
They got something else.yeah AMD still can’t get the XPS
Is he still upset over his 2020 G14?Check out Brutus’s comments about this — he makes good points.
Oh no, they pray to the lord and savior ARM iirc.Reddit is such a cheap target when half of them are wanking to AMD
They're ok.though hell, AMD GPUs do suck
It's just gb6.2 score rofl.3300 is a ridiculous take. He knows he's spouting bs since people have posted actual calculations without SME, but he's got his anti Apple agenda he wants to push.
It's just gb6.2 score rofl.
I'm just saying what it is.So you're pegging that on one isolated result, when we know how variable GB results can be?
Preach, brother, preach. June 3rd is literally 2 weeks away!But keep pushing your bs, maybe you'll find some people who will swallow it.
oh that’s a good point. That’s like 15-16% above best M3 or something right?Yeah 3300 is very low considering it scores 2700 with enough cooling in GB5. It’s a very impressive score in 5.
The highest M3 score is 2360ish in GB5.oh that’s a good point. That’s like 15-16% above best M3 or something right?
Link? I haven’t seen a single m4 score on 6.2It's just gb6.2 score rofl.
I know that (I’ve posted on here about the GB5 scores before). I was soliciting it to stir the pot, just to see what we could get out of it. Didn’t disappoint. But yeah it does look like they have some nonzero IPC gains without SME. Like 5%3300 is a ridiculous take. He knows he's spouting bs since people have posted actual calculations without SME, but he's got his anti Apple agenda he wants to push.
you got nothing.just to see what we could get out of it
oh yeah. zoomies.He might be right Zen 5 will be really good, I’m looking forward to it.
“3300 is a ridiculous take. He knows he's spouting bs since people have posted actual calculations without SME, but he's got his anti Apple agenda he wants to push.”you got nothing.
Hopefully!oh yeah. zoomies.
It doesn't look like Apple has the know-how anymore to redesign the core. Every generation after M1 has been using the transistor budget to just widen existing structures. Like Jim Keller said, every so often you have to re-write the core and rebalance the structures. Even if the underlying building blocks are the same, how you use them to construct the core matters a lot more. AMD did it with Zen 3 and now they will redo it with Zen 5. It doesn't appear Apple did it at all within the last 3 years.It appears M4 is 10 wide.
View attachment 99375
lol the power usage for the 14900K is off the charts. Look at that IPC advantage of the M4. 4.47GHz vs 6.00GHz.
This is part of the reason why Apple can stuff these in a tablet with out a fan.
Why would they actually redesign the core though if the basics still work? I don’t understand the fetishism for this. It’s fair to say their IPC gains have been mediocre since Nuvia left (with a delay obviously) but there’s no point in reinventing the wheel. Just look at results.It doesn't look like Apple has the know-how anymore to redesign the core. Every generation after M1 has been using the transistor budget to just widen existing structures. Like Jim Keller said, every so often you have to re-write the core and rebalance the structures. Even if the underlying building blocks are the same, how you use them to construct the core matters a lot more. AMD did it with Zen 3 and now they will redo it with Zen 5. It doesn't appear Apple did it at all within the last 3 years.
Yeah this checks out based on the 5-6% IPC gain. But where is this from? Geekerwan?It appears M4 is 10 wide.
Watts (more is better) is the meta.Pretty significant increase in core power there between M3 and M4