I laughed at how amazingly on point this is. bravo.-Right when you need Fox to both sides some shit they fuck it up. Figures.
What? Americans don't want war with Iran AND don't want nuclear proliferation? Those morons! Don't they see that force is the only way to ensure they don't get nuclear weapons! Surely the proletariat could think of something the lords and ladies couldn't!
The briefing was Fox News. He just wanted to make the story about himself, if the recent NYT article is to be believed.That the Iranians can cause an oil shock should probably have been in a briefing he received but could be difficult to relay in crayon or via the use of hand puppets.
The briefing was Fox News. He just wanted to make the story about himself, if the recent NYT article is to be believed.
How come no one is talking about what this has cost the tax payers? That attack must've a pricetag in the billions.
You know that they are going to replace the bombs they used, and that has a cost, right?The planes and bombs are paid for, the air force was just standing around doing nothing, I'd say the only real cost was the fuel and airframe wear and tear.
What? Americans don't want war with Iran AND don't want nuclear proliferation? Those morons! Don't they see that force is the only way to ensure they don't get nuclear weapons! Surely the proletariat could think of something the lords and ladies couldn't!
Republicans and bombing the Middle East, name a more iconic duoI wonder what the issue is. Are Americans too stupid to remember that’s it’s been republicans who have gotten us into wars in the last 50 years or are republicans so good at messaging that they’ve successfully rebranded the Democrat party as the party of war?
The ME needs a good bombing every once in a while.Republicans and bombing the Middle East, name a more iconic duo
You are a grotesque human. I hope nobody ever depends on you for anything.The ME needs a good bombing every once in a while.
Quoted for posterity.The ME needs a good bombing every once in a while.
The point is that the military budget won't have to be increased to pay for the bombings. Where they necessary? It seems unlikely because the excuse has been recycled so many times, though it's possible that Iran keeps rebuilding the program.You know that they are going to replace the bombs they used, and that has a cost, right?
I don't drive my car around thinking "well the gas has been paid for so my only cost is wear and tear."
You are a grotesque human. I hope nobody ever depends on you for anything.
This country needs regime change. Other countries should start calling for it.
Of course, you would trust the guy who took us out of a working JCPOA.Because we chose not to retaliate, we had peace for 5 years.
Nevertheless Irans nuclear ambitions had to be ended forcefully.
We been screaming dudeThis country needs regime change. Other countries should start calling for it.
Neocon DonSo is Donnie boy gonna go "ballistic" first time an Iranian missile hits a US something in the region?
I dont see him balancing a little tit for tat and balancing that equation at all.
So is Donnie boy gonna go "ballistic" first time an Iranian missile hits a US something in the region?
I dont see him balancing a little tit for tat and balancing that equation at all.
You know that they are going to replace the bombs they used, and that has a cost, right?
I don't drive my car around thinking "well the gas has been paid for so my only cost is wear and tear."