I mean we did drop a “full load of BOMBS” so surely that means it was a success. Nothing can stand up to that. Trump said it was obliterated and he is the most truthful and transparent president ever!
I mean we did drop a “full load of BOMBS” so surely that means it was a success. Nothing can stand up to that. Trump said it was obliterated and he is the most truthful and transparent president ever!They will say they destroyed it all anyway, of course.
We killed a shit ton of civilians in the first gulf war by putting a bunker buster into a civilian air raid shelter in Iraq.- It hadn't even occurred to me that bunker busters have never been used in combat before...
Prompt: give me a one-liner that says something positive but idiotic about Trump.Sig-worthy quote.
Shhh...don't tell anyone that our bunker busters went no where near the ~300 feet deep needed just to get to the top corridors. We would never want the world to know both that we failed and that our most powerful bunker busters don't do much.Shhh...don't tell anyone.. we have more bunker busters.
Shhh...don't tell anyone that our bunker busters went no where near the ~300 feet deep needed just to get to the top corridors. We would never want the world to know both that we failed and that our most powerful bunker busters don't do much.
Photo AFTER the bunker buster:
View attachment 126223
We'd need many, many more than what we have to get deep enough.
So, that leads... going full nuclear... the only way to make impossible to access the sites.They were never rated for anywhere near that. Up to 200ft of earth, only ~60ft of concrete (depending on psi). The Iranian sites were reportedly 300ft AND concrete. Was never gonna work. At least for anything more than making it inaccessible for X months.
So, that leads... going full nuclear... the only way to make impossible to access the sites.
Part of the principle of how these extra large bunker busters would work is that they would create a pressure wave that could severely damage or destroy the interior, even if they didn't fully reach the target.They were never rated for anywhere near that. Up to 200ft of earth, only ~60ft of concrete (depending on psi). The Iranian sites were reportedly 300ft AND concrete. Was never gonna work. At least for anything more than making it inaccessible for X months.
Part of the principle of how these extra large bunker busters would work is that they would create a pressure wave that could severely damage or destroy the interior, even if they didn't fully reach the target.
Part of the principle of how these extra large bunker busters would work is that they would create a pressure wave that could severely damage or destroy the interior, even if they didn't fully reach the target.
Collapsing the centrifuge hall with the shockwave surely was the hoped for result. Doesn't sound like it happened though. Since the Iranians buried the portals before the strike safe to assume the centrifuge cascades were shut down already removing other likely avenue of damage (they are very delicate when operating).
Another aspect of the kabuki theater going on here. That and the observed caravan of cargo trucks that were publicly seen leaving the site on satellite imagery.
I think I heard Marco Rubio assert that there were no trucks and if there were we or Israel woulda destroyed them. The lies are becoming even lazier, if possible.
Part of the principle of how these extra large bunker busters would work is that they would create a pressure wave that could severely damage or destroy the interior, even if they didn't fully reach the target.
I heard that they targeted ventilation shafts to get the initial strike to go deeper. But yeah could be fake news inspired by a Starwars plot...They were never rated for anywhere near that. Up to 200ft of earth, only ~60ft of concrete (depending on psi). The Iranian sites were reportedly 300ft AND concrete. Was never gonna work. At least for anything more than making it inaccessible for X months.
A New York Times analysis of satellite imagery shows that the United States targeted Fordo, Iran’s underground nuclear enrichment facility, at the precise locations of two structures that experts said might be ventilation shafts.
The structures were visible only during the early stages of the plant’s operation, and could be seen in satellite images in 2009. By 2011, both were no longer visible. Experts said they might be ventilation shafts used during the plant’s construction, and then buried.
And successive bombs could be dropped in the same hole to drill down.
Amazing that you have better info than the US and Israeli intelligence and military combined! How is that possible?Shhh...don't tell anyone that our bunker busters went no where near the ~300 feet deep needed just to get to the top corridors. We would never want the world to know both that we failed and that our most powerful bunker busters don't do much.
Photo AFTER the bunker buster:
View attachment 126223
We'd need many, many more than what we have to get deep enough.
Amazing that you have better info than the US and Israeli intelligence and military combined! How is that possible?
Makes you wonder if that's why tactical nukes were floated around.Shhh...don't tell anyone that our bunker busters went no where near the ~300 feet deep needed just to get to the top corridors. We would never want the world to know both that we failed and that our most powerful bunker busters don't do much.
Photo AFTER the bunker buster:
View attachment 126223
We'd need many, many more than what we have to get deep enough.