In New York, where adultery is classified as a Class B misdemeanor that is punishable by up to 90 days in jail and a $500 fine.No one said banging a porn star is illegal in the US. That's not what this trial is about. It's about illegal hush money payments.
As long as we're just asking questions.
What about falling asleep at your own criminal trial, is that illegal?
What about farting in the court?
Isn't lust a sin in the bible?
Isn't adultery against the ten commandments?
Mike Johnson in the court room is completely inappropriate.
In New York, where adultery is classified as a Class B misdemeanor that is punishable by up to 90 days in jail and a $500 fine.
Map shows 16 states where it's illegal to cheat on your wife
The list of states where adultery is a crime could drop to 15 as New York legislators consider repealing an old law.www.newsweek.com
Right wing media has been incessantly parroting that they don't even know what crime Trump has been charged with. So far as to pretend the trial has no purpose as there's nothing to prosecute.This post sums you up. Ignorant clown. He is on trial for fraud not cheating on his wife with a porn star. Damn, you are pathetic.
For each of Trump's misdemeanor adulteries...I'm all for jailing Trump for 90 days and a $500 fine.
It's not illegal, but asking for some consistency in one's views is fair game (e.g. Johnson being against porn but wholly supporting a guy banging pornstars). But barely anyone in the GOP (or their supporters it seems) appears to be capable of any consistency these days.Banging a porn star isn't illegal.
Mike Johnson in the court room is completely inappropriate.
"Hopefully we’ll have more and more senators and congressmen go up every day to represent him and be able to go out and overcome this gag order, and that’s one of the reasons we went — is to be able to speak our piece for President Trump,”
This case is pretty open and closed. The only way Trump gets even a hung jury is if some juror refuses to convict it's because of their own bias.Guilty of what, paying a pornstar to hide an affair?
Of being the victim of blackmail and extortion?
If you think MAGA believes Trump to be guilty, you haven't been paying attention.
Crime, what crime?
You point to some bookkeeping shit and they will reject the very notion.
For this case I am skeptical, but I am willing to let a Judge and a Jury decide - as they hold all the facts. The fine details of who did what when, and how that may apply to some written code.
But you are very mistaken if you think MAGA... thinks like you. Tribalism demands that they are all innocent and we are all guilty.
I don't see that view as inconsistent. Most people that are down on porn just don't want kids to have access to it. When it's a religious thing I firmly support their right to not watch it, and don't much care what they do in private.It's not illegal, but asking for some consistency in one's views is fair game (e.g. Johnson being against porn but wholly supporting a guy banging pornstars). But barely anyone in the GOP (or their supporters it seems) appears to be capable of any consistency these days.
It’s pretty inconsistent. Evangelicals used to pretend morality in public officials was very important right up until it was inconvenient. Then they stopped caring immediately.I don't see that view as inconsistent. Most people that are down on porn just don't want kids to have access to it. When it's a religious thing I firmly support their right to not watch it, and don't much care what they do in private.
Is that particularly unlikely though? We know that Trumpers are fairly immune to any ideas that go against what they already believe so if there's one on the jury I could absolutely see that happening.This case is pretty open and closed. The only way Trump gets even a hung jury is if some juror refuses to convict it's because of their own bias.
I mean it hasn’t happened in his other trials.Is that particularly unlikely though? We know that Trumpers are fairly immune to any ideas that go against what they already believe so if there's one on the jury I could absolutely see that happening.
At least it's in an area that isn't Trumpestan but it only needs one and there's a disturbing amount of them out there.
I think they would be effectively acting as agents of Trump if they directly violate the gag order on his behalf (particularly after admitting such!), and if they specifically endanger the jury or court staff, the judge could not only have the perps charged, he could also find Trump to be in violation of the gag order.Tommy Tuberville on why he attended the trial:
"and be able to go out and overcome this gag order"
Pathetic ... They are so blinded by the Trump derangement cult that they have no clue, or care why gag orders are imposed!
And now the prosecution will/should raise this with the judge.
All the remarks from Trump’s sycophant peanut gallery were eerily similar. like they were reading from a script.
Most people who are down on porn forget when they first saw it, or they're just severe hypocrites.I don't see that view as inconsistent. Most people that are down on porn just don't want kids to have access to it. When it's a religious thing I firmly support their right to not watch it, and don't much care what they do in private.
I don't see that view as inconsistent. Most people that are down on porn just don't want kids to have access to it. When it's a religious thing I firmly support their right to not watch it, and don't much care what they do in private.
Neither is watching porn, but Michael Johnson claims to be against both.Banging a porn star isn't illegal.
These fine MAGA people who wrap themselves in the flag also have no problem with him storing and showing off highly classified material at his resort. Who gives a shit what they believe?Guilty of what, paying a pornstar to hide an affair?
Of being the victim of blackmail and extortion?
If you think MAGA believes Trump to be guilty, you haven't been paying attention.
Crime, what crime?
You point to some bookkeeping shit and they will reject the very notion.
For this case I am skeptical, but I am willing to let a Judge and a Jury decide - as they hold all the facts. The fine details of who did what when, and how that may apply to some written code.
But you are very mistaken if you think MAGA... thinks like you. Tribalism demands that they are all innocent and we are all guilty.
Seems like they would like to give the jury a different narrative to think about.But prosecution has to prove their case not defense to prove innocent