What, no love for Pelican Lake?
Time to update the naming. Too many lakes.
Haha, it's all lakes for years and years to come. Some of them sound pretty cool, though, esp. in the 7nm generation
Isn't Intel working on a complete revamp of X86 for post tiger lake chips? I read some new stories about it dated from last year. Supposedly leaner, faster and all that kind of stuff.
Isn't Intel working on a complete revamp of X86 for post tiger lake chips? I read some new stories about it dated from last year. Supposedly leaner, faster and all that kind of stuff.
Yep, but Sapphire Rapid is at least 3 years away. Stuff could change.
WTH is Sapphire Rapid?? Chipset?
Why do you say that?
One thing I'd use 6-cores for occasionally would be video encoding. And that could take a long time, at full tilt. It'd probably throttle at all-core Turbo in short order, unless it was a custom build with some upgraded cooling or something.
What comes after Tigerlake. 7nm. Potentially anything could be removed in favor of whatever makes Amazon and Google happy.
It was in a Lenovo roadmap, it is the first 7nm product. It's somewhere in my tweet history.Is there any recent reference to this? Because I cannot find it (which could be just me).
What comes after Tigerlake. 7nm. Potentially anything could be removed in favor of whatever makes Amazon and Google happy.
It was in a Lenovo roadmap, it is the first 7nm product. It's somewhere in my tweet history.
No. Sapphire Rapid comes after Ice Lake-SP in servers, but on client, the post-Tiger part isn't a rapid (nor is it a Sapphire, AFAIK).
That is unless Intel somehow manages to screw the pooch on either Coffeelake
It used to be rivers.
At this point I'm almost wondering if Intel will even bother to continue to do mainstream cores. I guess they could shrink Tigerlake to 7 nm.
At this point I'm almost wondering if Intel will even bother to continue to do mainstream cores. I guess they could shrink Tigerlake to 7 nm.
They need client CPUs, at the least, to keep wafer volumes up.
Yeah well, the socket forced march is par for the course as far as Intel goes.They partially did that already by requiring a new socket/chipset for CL.
Yeah well, the socket forced march is par for the course as far as Intel goes.
Hell no! Just saying that fishes are going to swim, ya knowWell, that just auto makes it proper then I guess, just because Intel has done it before?
Hell no! Just saying that fishes are going to swim, ya know
They are doing mainstream cores still. There's a *lot* of lakes in the pipeline -- mainstream Core as well as Atom.
No. Sapphire Rapid comes after Ice Lake-SP in servers, but on client, the post-Tiger part isn't a rapid (nor is it a Sapphire, AFAIK).
OC3D owner Tom Logan said: Just as a parting gift, if youve read this far and youve watched the video thank you, if youre here to see if you need to buy the 7820X or for that matter any X299 as the basis for your gaming system we have one thing to say to you. Don't. In the grand scheme of things you either want to go and grab a Z270 /7700K based system or if you want a few more cores for occasional rendering and streaming then just go buy the Ryzen 1700. If you do buy AMD though don't turn into one of the mentalist fanboy keyboard warriors ruining the scene at the moment.
Thanks for clearing that up. Is it known by what name the Tiger Lake successor goes?
This kind of sealed the deal for me and makes me look at Coffee Lake-S 6C/12T for my gaming rig.