1.1 mOhms is the Intel maximum value for the S line with 65/125W "base power", mobo makers are supposed to test and establish the lower value that is appropriate for each of their boards. But for argument's sake, if the customer were to set 1.1mOhms, then there should be no need for further...
There's this video from Buildzoid where he tests the effect of switching frequency on the MSI Z690 Pro-A.
Both systems were built with the same MSI Z690-A board? This might be explained by higher chip variance in the lower bins. Even with the aggressive Asus and Gigabyte LL settings only a...
Your memory kit is listed on the Z790 Sonic - Alder Lake QVL list as working @ 5600 MT/s with Bios version 1.17 from what I can see:
Are your DIMMs mounted in slots A2 and B2?
For context on what @zir_blazer is annoyed about: there are 3200 / 22-22-22 / 1.2V modules on the market, and they most likely lack an XMP profile. So the customer can pick one or the other, but never both.
Friendly reminder that (some) mobo makers also managed to screw things up for AMD and customers. AMD should also have known better than to let them play with the red buttons. Always have limits.
Rest assured, we'll get more and more pages until Intel shines light on the issue. All we need is an official statement and a clear path forward for the affected customers, months after the problem was reported in the media. Apparently that is a hard task for one of the biggest tech companies in...
Some context based on the table above: if CEP is enabled by default, even if they allow mobo makers to adjust AC Load Line on their own, they are no longer over rewarded for undervolting the CPU. In fact, the opposite is now true, aggressive undervolting with CEP enabled will lead to lower...
No it doesn't, what a way to misrepresent the situation. Where are your "correct settings" in this conclusion of yours? Did you tell folks they can still enjoy the game with SSGI instead of Lumen, did you tell them Lumen is not the default GI setting after the upgrade? I had to enable it...
We have confirmation from Anandtech on the new naming scheme leak:
https://www.anandtech.com/show/21386/upcoming-amd-ryzen-ai-9-hx-170-processor-leaked-by-asus-
Asus changed the CPU names but Anandtech found the receipts in Google's cache:
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.