- Mar 3, 2017
- 1,615
- 5,870
- 136
The source for the other leaked figures has not been proved correct or incorrect yet.Why are all of you assuming those GB numbers are correct? What is the source, RGT?
I can assure you they are made up as I typed them myself. But really I don't expect much higher. GB6 puts 7950X at 2939 average single core score, so this represents a 23% improvement.Why are all of you assuming those GB numbers are correct? What is the source, RGT?
Great. Just triggered two pages of confusion and incorrect speculation in the wrong direction.I can assure you they are made up as I typed them myself.
Are you sure it's the wrong direction? I'm pretty sure you speculated it could be even lower at times.Great. Just triggered two pages of confusion and incorrect speculation in the wrong direction.
12 core vs 8 core CPU.Internal information that StrixPoint is 1.3x MT perf of HawkPoint/Phoenix.
I'm not sure but just calculate by yourself. 8700G MT scores ~18000pts in R23 and 7940HS is ~17000pts in some models.
I don’t know whether it’s a likely prediction or not. But it would have been good to know that it was just your personal guesstimate, and not an actual measurement from a Zen5 CPU which was how it was intepreted by people in this thread.Are you sure it's the wrong direction? I'm pretty sure you speculated it could be even lower at times.
And I should have let them run with it because at least it is a realistic baseless number instead of the exceptional 32% and now 40%.
Past performance. RDNA3 estimates were way off but based in truth. The same thing is happening here, from the same source.Anyway, what makes you think GB6 score you speculated at 3628 is close to the correct one?
More precisely 4xZen5 + 8xZen5C vs 8xZen4.12 core vs 8 core CPU.
Assuming that they are working within the same power envelope, and speculating the Zen5c cores are 60% perf of the Zen5 cores, a 1.3x improvement in MT score in CB r23 can be explained by a 20% increase in per core performance of Zen5 over Zen4 in that specific workload.Internal information that StrixPoint is 1.3x MT perf of HawkPoint/Phoenix.
I'm not sure but just calculate by yourself. 8700G MT scores ~18000pts in R23 and 7940HS is ~17000pts in some models.
While I have no opinion on your numbers, I'd point out that no one, not even AMD themselves have got RDNA3 perf projections right.Past performance. RDNA3 estimates were way off but based in truth. The same thing is happening here, from the same source.
Kids are running some nutso mental gymnastics championship trying to find a gotcha (which doesn't exist).So Zen 5 has only a 15% increase in Geekbench but a 40% increase in SIR2017?
Viewport performance is limited by ST perf.Tell me the CAD performance, thats what i care about. Viewport performance on AutoCAD is everything but fluent on 7950x - on drawings with lot of blocks and whatnot. In that regard not much changed compared to my previous Intel Skylake-X cpu.
Not even the slightest idea about niche meme applications.Tell me the CAD performance
Gonna remain a software problem.Viewport performance on AutoCAD is everything but fluent on 7950x - on drawings with lot of blocks and whatnot.
Doesn't (V-)cache help?Viewport performance is limited by ST perf.
No. On the contrary it might even cause regressions.Doesn't (V-)cache help?
Zen5 vs Zen5C should be like Zen4 vs Zen4C.More precisely 4xZen5 + 8xZen5C vs 8xZen4.
If it would have been 12xZen5, it would mean a regression core-to-core if MT perf increase over 8xZen4 was only 30%.
Since Strix Point is a mix of Zen5 & Zen5C it’s hard to draw any conclusions regarding Zen5 perf when comparing MT perf of Strix Point vs pure Zen4 CPUs.
it's higher but w/everOnly 30% increase should be most likely due to a limited TDP.
You are hilarious.niche meme applications.
Good.Things have gone too far, the AT forum hype train has reached germany and we are good for a world tour in no time, next target is the moon.