- Mar 3, 2017
- 1,623
- 5,894
- 136
Sure, but a 43% a MSRP hike on 950X seems a bit crazy. The 5950X didn't have any competition for a year yet they only increased MSRP by 7% over 3950x.AMD have never been afraid to hike prices when they have the best product. They did it in the athlon 64 FX days, they did it a bit with Zen 3 and if Zen 5 has no competition they will do it again.
Regarding competition, I guess it depends on who you want to believe.AMD have never been afraid to hike prices when they have the best product. They did it in the athlon 64 FX days, they did it a bit with Zen 3 and if Zen 5 has no competition they will do it again.
The question you did not address is availability. It seems Zen 5 will be soon, while we know Arrow lake is a ways out. Will Zen 6 come out before Arrow lake ? I am just going to wait and see. And still waiting to see a DT or server Intel sku that does not suck the power (yes, meteorlake is getting in the ballpark, notice I said desktop and server)Regarding competition, I guess it depends on who you want to believe.
According to an article on Techradar based on e.g. MLID predictions we have this:
"According to one of the YouTuber’s top Intel sources, Arrow Lake is set to be a 25% to 35% performance boost over Meteor Lake, as MLID has been saying for some time now – and that’s a minimum (so it could turn out better – we recall one leak suggesting 40%, though that was a good way back now).
[...]
while Arrow Lake could be a much bigger leap for performance (35% versus 15-20%, so perhaps double the gains AMD provides), Zen 5 might be first to market by a clear couple of months. Zen 5 may also (apply seasoning) be a fair bit cheaper, as Arrow Lake is built on a more advanced (and expensive) process (3nm, versus 4nm for AMD).
[...]
MLID also points out that while Arrow Lake is expected to be in pole position for overall raw performance at launch, AMD will soon have X3D spins for Zen 5 desktop processors on the case – and these will level out any advantage that Team Blue has."
Not sure what to make of that. Indication is that Intel Arrow Lake will have higher performance than Zen5 and therefore also will be even more expensive. Then a new LGA1851 socket for Intel on top of that adding cost, unless upgrading from another platform anyway.
Arrow Lake could offer huge performance gains, but AMD’s Zen 5 might still defeat Intel’s mighty next-gen CPUs
Intel should win for raw performance, at least initially – but there’s more to consider herewww.techradar.com
Right. The article says this regarding Arrow Lake availability:The question you did not address is availability. It seems Zen 5 will be soon, while we know Arrow lake is a ways out. Will Zen 6 come out before Arrow lake ? I am just going to wait and see. And still waiting to see a DT or server Intel sku that does not suck the power (yes, meteorlake is getting in the ballpark, notice I said desktop and server)
Well AMD did a price hike like this with Threadripper.Sure, but a 43% a MSRP hike on 950X seems a bit crazy. The 5950X didn't have any competition for a year yet they only increased MSRP by 7% over 3950x.
The likelihood is that we’ll see both Arrow Lake desktop and Lunar Lake before this year is out, at roughly the same time, late in 2024, in Q4. The key question for those looking at a next-gen CPU is – will Zen 5 be out first, and obviously how might these rival ranges stack up?"[/I]
So Arrow Lake might not be available until late 2024 or early 2025, but certainly before Zen6 and likely before Zen5 X3D.
Man, this thread is wild...I dont like memes at all, but one cant deny that they are very creative about thoses rumours at WCCF TROLLs Inc forums...
As for initial price hikes to MSRP that are changed in months. This might be due to availability. If the initial demand outstrips supply, AMD would rather pocket the difference than retailers.
They did, when they increased core count from initial 16. And then again later, with the WX line-up, which however was marketed as separate, sort of superior tier. As it the case again now with TRs 7000s. Either way, its not comparable situation.Well AMD did a price hike like this with Threadripper.
AMD could use the Ryzen Ultra namethey would first create some Pro, Ultra, Max, whatever S-tier to sell at such price.
The 7700x is $114 and the 7800X3D is $217 at MC with bundle pricing. If you add each individual item from the bundle (don't just add the bundle) you can see prices for the individual items shown in the cart with the discount applied. You can then return the mobo and/or RAM from the bundle if you don't want them, although the discounts are also okay on those items.Here are the current prices and how a $499 Zen 5 would fit in:
7700X - $399 (Discounted to $269 at MicroCenter)
7800X3D - $449 (Discounted to $349 at MicroCenter)
9800X - $499 (base model no V-Cache)
I don't really see the point, of AMD provoking ire of customers and reviewers by unrealistically high price, only to discount it back to more "normal price a couple of months later.
AMD would still be printing money selling the CPU at $399 to $449 MSRP and not discounting...
It's their masterplan to get AMD CPUs in as many homes and as many office desks as possible. It will continue after Zen 5 launch but with Zen 4 and Zen 3 and Mendocino etc.I'm not sure how relevant this is to the discussion, but it sure makes you wonder how concerned AMD is with maintaining high margin if they can cut a deal with a major US retailer that allows for discounts like that.
So if 9800X is $499 it will be more than 4x as expensive as 7700X. I think that will be very hard to justify for most people.The 7700x is $114 and the 7800X3D is $217 at MC with bundle pricing.
So if 9800X is $499 it will be more than 4x as expensive as 7700X. I think that will be very hard to justify for most people.
That said, the MC deals are insanely good. I wonder if AMD and MC both are clearing stock in preparation for Zen5 launch, although it seems a bit early for that unless the Zen4 inventory is very high.
They've been doing bundle deals since last fall. I bought 2 7800X3D's last November in a previous iteration of the bundle that had a different motherboard. At the time the CPU price in the cart was just under $250. The discounts on the motherboard and RAM were larger than the current bundle. I returned them and bought higher end open box boards for less money than the price of the bundle board. I already had a few 32 gig DRR5 6000 C30 kits from the previous years holiday sales.So if 9800X is $499 it will be more than 4x as expensive as 7700X. I think that will be very hard to justify for most people.
That said, the MC deals are insanely good. I wonder if AMD and MC both are clearing stock in preparation for Zen5 launch, although it seems a bit early for that unless the Zen4 inventory is very high.
Yes I agree. A bundle is likely especially if they go crazy on MSRP. The proposed 9800X price of $500 isn't nearly as bad as $1000 for a 9950X but I still think that $500 asking price is bad PR. You can buy a 7950X3D for $550 right now. The early adopter tax strategy is dumb. They seem committed to it on both the CPU and GPU side. At this point I wouldn't even consider buying an AMD product until it's selling at a discount from MSRP.MC deals are indeed insane and not representative of prices available to most buyers. Besides that, when Zen5 launches it will likely get its own bundle deals at MC so we can't compare those prices now. At most U.S. retailers, the 7800X3D is $370 and the 7700X is $285-$330. The point being made still remains though, if the 9800X is $499, it better offer some huge leaps in performance.
You also couldn't buy one for many months after launch. The only Vermeer available was the 5800X in that time period.The 5950X didn't have any competition for a year yet they only increased MSRP by 7% over 3950x.
Because comp pressure.
Which Zen5 has none of.
Not until 2026.
Haha, yes. Give the man his money :-DAMD could use the Ryzen Ultra name
Lisa, pay me if you use that!
It exists.I'm afraid I'm a bit out of the loop- what's the latest news on Strix Halo?
CES'25.or when it's actually coming out.
I bet you cant get it to 60%...............Now the hype has reached videocardz
AMD Zen5 architecture is allegedly 40% faster core-to-core than Zen4 in SPEC benchmarks - VideoCardz.com
Rumor: AMD Zen5 is 40% faster than Zen4 in SPEC benchmarks According to reputable leaker “Kepler_L2”, AMD’s next-gen CPU architecture is said to provide (up to) 40% increase over Zen4. AMD’s Zen 5 CPU architecture appears to be gearing up for a major improvement over its predecessor, Zen 4...videocardz.com
All The Watts above just said STX Halo should outperform N33. But iirc STX Halo shouldn't be released as a DIY part. Only for Laptops or soldered Mini PCs.I'm afraid I'm a bit out of the loop- what's the latest news on Strix Halo? I'm interested in it for a new gaming HTPC, but I'm not sure what performance it's aiming for, or when it's actually coming out.