I think you mean 13900H. But yeah, I noticed some really good deals on laptops with Raptor Lake chips the last time I was browsing on Amazon UAE. Can't be a coincidence...
Oh my sweet summer child.View attachment 98066
Naaaaaaaah there's no way.
I can't be reading this right.
There's no way Intel would market a CPU as "45W" and it actually runs anywhere between 60W and....195W....right?
This is an elaborate troll. It's not real.
LMAO. That’s literally as clear as it gets that Intel was turning the blind eye.HUB video cites Cutress from an AT interview:
View attachment 98047
999w is IN SPEC.
Interview from 2019:
Gotta love how the "intel baseline" isn't the same across motherboard vendors. Almost like the intel baseline isn't provided by intel but cooked up by each vendor on their own.Also it's worth noting that SVID set to intel fail safe runs more Vcore than the ASUS default settings for any scenario that doesn't hit the power limit. Gigabyte's intel baseline profile does the same. Most gigabyte boards use AC_LL and DC_LL of less than 1.1mOhms on default but with the baseline profile the AC and DC_LL get set to 1.7mOhm which raise the core voltage for any workload that doesn't hit power limits.
Good video Steve. I do wish you had stressed the potential danger of setting these profiles though given they increase ACLL so much and hence core voltage. Setting SVID Behavior to Intel Failsafe on my 14900ks results in a voltage in bios of 1.63v!!! Looks like you ended up at 1.48v for your 14900k.
I doubt it's their engineering teams, I bet 50mV it's the management playing with things they no longer understand.Back to engineering school, Intel chipset validation division!
Buildzoid follows up again-
Interesting anecdote from the comments of the HUB vid -
It's only a news item though.Article on TechPowerUp
Intel Statement on Stability Issues: "Motherboard Makers to Blame"
A couple of weeks ago, we reported on NVIDIA directing users of Intel's 13th Generation Raptor Lake and 14th Generation Raptor Lake Refresh CPUs to consult Intel for any issues with system stability. Motherboard makers, by default, often run the CPU outside of Intel's recommended specifications...www.techpowerup.com
EDIT: or is that forbidden here?
It's only a news item though.
And plenty of damage control in the comments especially from that "TPU proofreader" who seems to like making excuses for companies.
ComputerBase implied they were going to do an article but haven't see anything since. They also don't like rocking the boat!
I don't read plebbit anymore but I'm going to hope they learned to be funny and are all writing puns."Damage Control"?
What you call what people are writing on r/Intel?
TPU has an...odd...attitude to certain notoriously bad products. I remember when the 4060 Ti came out and got the Highly Recommended sticker, there was a large revolt in the forums and they took it out, but the article still has the stigmata.And plenty of damage control in the comments especially from that "TPU proofreader" who seems to like making excuses for companies.
Well, I think I'd rather not go and look actual!"Damage Control"?
What you call what people are writing on r/Intel?
There is being afraid of being put on blacklist by a mega corporations PR department, and there is being a toady.TPU has an...odd...attitude to certain notoriously bad products. I remember when the 4060 Ti came out and got the Highly Recommended sticker, there was a large revolt in the forums and they took it out, but the article still has the stigmata.
Plus, this way none will have jumped on the story and hence Intel's PR people can hardly blacklist them!I think some of the review sites are doing a wait and see approach coz there's no telling how many BIOS updates may get released before the issue is settled as resolved.
I'm still waiting for this to be true.Inb4 ARL launch where Intel uses RPL with the Multicore Enhancement setting for ARL's efficiency gain claims while using RPL with the Intel Baseline Profile setting for ARL's performance gain claims.
Joking of course.
AMD CPUs aren't really burning themselves out though. They briefly had a completely unnecessary stint where Zen4 was overvolting vSoC to keep EXPO kits stable (it wasn't necessary at all, and that was hammered out pretty quickly. 230W PPT isn't hurting any Zen4.Revolting... And also likely to get away with it.
This brazen practice has already lured AMD to increase the TDP in their newest chips... Bulldozer lessons be damned!
AMD CPUs aren't really burning themselves out though. They briefly had a completely unnecessary stint where Zen4 was overvolting vSoC to keep EXPO kits stable (it wasn't necessary at all, and that was hammered out pretty quickly. 230W PPT isn't hurting any Zen4.
I think I'll pass on the hour, but I'm not sure why he complains about Gigabyte so much?Buildzoid spends an hour talking about Gigabyte's Intel baseline profile on a z790 Aorus ExtremeX with a 14900k that can't do a cinebench after a clear cmos action: