Ugh. Guess Dell is busy counting the bags of money Intel sent to them.Dell no, rest yea.
Wait I could've sworn that was "Lenovo no" before.Dell no, rest yea.
Ugh. Guess Dell is busy counting the bags of money Intel sent to them.
How come Lenovo is late to the party?
They're usually not the latest on getting AMD stuff out.
But not one of them with the 4080 or 4090, even in the Zephyrus form (Intel based G16 got up to 4090).
View attachment 98468
Lisa - "We're seeing faster ramp up and more designs than Hawk in the same timeframe"
@adroc_thurston "They wouldn’t be getting so many design wins if the product wasn't good."
That's a very strong line-up. Even managed to get some ASUS ProArt wins (Usually Intel dominated). Lenovo, HP, Dell and Acer will probably follow with huge portfolio of design wins for Strix. Computex will be nice.
Dell doesn't have the designs but yeah Lenovo refresh window doesn't quite align with STX1.Wait I could've sworn that was "Lenovo no" before.
Dell just doesn't have the designs for Strix.If Strix is that good then AMD should allocate them no more than the 3% AMD chips they are using in their laptops, that wouldnt be a big loss, better to supply the chips left to the numerous chinese OEMs like Framework, Ayaneo and other Minisforum
Dell just doesn't have the designs for Strix.
No, they just don't have the designs for Strix.Guess that AMD didnt even send them a test plateform, first thing they would have done is to call their Intel buddies to give them full access to check the beast s numbers.
I guess we're still locked at Renoir era practices of matching the AMD chip with low/mid-end dGPU.But not one of them with the 4080 or 4090, even in the Zephyrus form (Intel based G16 got up to 4090).
Not sure what to think about that. It's quite probable to see Asus's Strix line with Strix Point. But the absence of at least a 4080 on the lesser models is inexplicable.
Make sense. Lenovo usually refresh their designs around CES.Dell doesn't have the designs but yeah Lenovo refresh window doesn't quite align with STX1.
Dell just doesn't have the designs for Strix.
Dell probably exchanged Strix for a discounted Lunar supply from Intel😂Guess that AMD didnt even send them a test plateform, first thing they would have done is to call their Intel buddies to give them full access to check the beast s numbers.
We'll see, but I've heard more than once about these magical explosions of AMD sales in server, and it's been a slow grind. Wouldn't be surprised if it's just as slow a grind in laptops.
There might also be other consequences if Intel really is starting to break apart openly.
Best friend money can buy.Ugh. Guess Dell is busy counting the bags of money Intel sent to them.
I'm wondering who would use 5000€ on standard computer instead of buying a custom,.Plenty of people with no technical knowledge buy these computers for themselves or their children. Here is one more:
File a corruption report.Enterprise market is mired in corruption. The steady stream of box seats ticket for the local sports team probably has higher weight in brand decision than any technical parameter of the product. Intel thrives in this environment.
I'm wondering who would use 5000€ on standard computer instead of buying a custom,.
Collecters items sure I can somewhat understand, if you have the money. But buying overpriced of the rack systems?There are people who buy 20 000$ watches, and even 200 000 $ ones, so a 5000$ PC....
File a corruption report.
It was this that you wrote which I commented on:The discussion was about how much market share Zen 5 can gain (if it is as good as people say).
Intel's anticompetitive practices vs. technical capabilities of the products were brought up only in relevance to that. Intel has been under investigation in number for countries. You can look it up. But that's not topic of this thread.
So if they have been found guilty of corruption, I assume they have been convicted and it should not be a problem any longer?Enterprise market is mired in corruption. The steady stream of box seats ticket for the local sports team probably has higher weight in brand decision than any technical parameter of the product. Intel thrives in this environment.
So if they have been found guilty of corruption, I assume they have been convicted?
Ok, so problem solved?Yes, in the EU Intel was condemned and fined for anti competitive practices at the retailers level.
Not solved, temporarly closed but you wont keeping someone who drink from being drunk again, that s an addiction, to tell it in short terms no bribes no Intel.Ok, so problem solved?
Or is there any problem with corruption remaining currently, and if so why not file a new corruption report?
It does seem like when this kind of behavior is publicly exposed and prosecuted (either legally or by the free market), the companies never stop - They just tone it down and get better at hiding it.Not solved, temporarly closed but you wont keeping someone who drink from being drunk again, that s an addiction, to tell it in short terms no bribes no Intel.
I'm wondering who would use 5000€ on standard computer instead of buying a custom,.
It does seem like when this kind of behavior is publicly exposed and prosecuted (either legally or by the free market), the companies never stop - They just tone it down and get better at hiding it.
The only reason I could find was of the warranty behind it is rock solid. Years ago, I had a bit of.money laying around and bought a laptop which was for work and for hobby (photography). The thing cost me quite a bit.I'm wondering who would use 5000€ on standard computer instead of buying a custom,.