Its off right now to save power, but which PG type would be the best to test ? Easy to change my setup, now that I am not going PG anymore, so I could test this. like LLR SOB or something ? and what config, just for this run all 192 threads ? (normally leave at 50% and no SMP)@Markfw
Have you ever measured the power usage from the wall for the 9654 under a heavy AVX-512 load, like in PrimeGrid?
What's your estimate for the 9654's power usage at full load?
oh, threads per each task ?Could you try Proth Prime Search LLR (PPS) at 1 core each at 50% total cpu usage
They're relatively short and should give me the number I'm looking for.
Thx
Right. I was considering a QS, so I'll assume it's slightly worse.Its competing
Interesting good or bad ? This is a retail CPU BTW. Here is a pic for performance purposes.
M97 is not bad..... And QA for the 9554s I have is very close to retail. but the QS 9654's say 2.4 base, and the QS's say "2.15 to ...." Mine run at 2.7 fully loaded, all cores. so worse case 250 mhz slower, but $1800 vs $4850 is a BIG difference. (QS to retail)Right. I was considering a QS, so I'll assume it's slightly worse.
The only thing that's holding me back is the availability of the heatsink I want. (AMD SP5 M99)
Guess I'll keep dreaming about it for a little longer 🛌💤
From first test, a picTemps only at 66 C huh?
Perhaps I don't need the dual-tower cooler then 🤔
You are more than welcome !Appreciate you turning on your 9654 and finding that out for me. Thanks again 🍻
I was going to reply. But HWINFO64 locked up the 9554 windows box while analyzing XTU...One more reference but with a 9554 Q.S. and the same MBD-H13SSL-N.
Note that this Q.S. tops out at 3.5 Ghz. I've noticed that over about 52C it seems to throw a temp code that HWinfo can read and maxes out out 3.5 vs Retail of 3.75. for both single / low core use and all core use. I've never seen it go over 3.5 ghz.
This is with both TDP and PPT set to 400W in the bios, 1 NVME drive and the fans connected to MB. No dGPU, just the built in BMC for video.
Only 6 sticks / 6 channels of SuperMicro certified RAM = 96 GB total.
Win10 Pro. 5 case fans (two blowing vertically to help cool VRMS). Using "CoolServer" SP5 / M98 heatsink. It has 6 heatpipes vs 5 of the M97, though I don't know if it is really any better and it is around $20 U.S. more expensive.
Idle = 65W to 75 W on Kill-a-Watt. From HWinfo: Idle CPU power package of 38ish Watts.
With 400W PPT setting on Proth Prime Search with 64 Tasks of 1 core each (No Lasso Running) = 524W at 3.5 Ghz.
With 400W PPT setting on PPS with 64 Tasks of 1 core each and Lasso Running with SMT off on the PPS tasks = 530W at 3.5 Ghz.
After running now for about 15 minutes of PPS with SMT off in this Fractal Design Meshify 2XL case that has both sides on and only the stock Fractal 2 intake fans (I need to increase the intake fan flow still), the CPU is 75C and the VRMS are at 81C. Room temp is around 19.5C.
During the last PG challenge the cpu topped out at 76, but the vrms hit 85C. at 400W TDP setting and runing 3.5 Ghz. I noticed that at around 380W TDP setting the frequency started to drop 50 to 100 mghz, but I did not play around with lower settings than 380.
You have to count memory wattage, motherboard, hard drives , video cards, fans and everything else. @450 watt that leaves 50 watts for all of the above. Even with no video card, just the memory takes 12-30 watts.Rosetta at 128 tasks with nothing else running uses about 450W at the same 400W TDP setting.
I'm running a time comparison now between the 9554 QS and a 7950x set at 140W TDP in Proth Prime Seach at 16 tasks x 1 core with Lasso and SMT set to off. It won't be a perfect test, cause I using the 7950x now with a gpu, but it will be close enough. And otherwise I really don't care