Lord, we're in for a ride.Well, every skin pore is kind of a microscopic orifice
Lord, we're in for a ride.Well, every skin pore is kind of a microscopic orifice
You pay for capacity. You pay on a "per/GB" basis. Of course higher clocked memory is going to be more expensive, however...
... AMD is DOWNCLOCKING 20 Gbps to 18 Gbps GDDR6 chips.
Cause they like to pay more to deliver less? Or its because those are the only available chips on the market?
If It's the full AD106(36SM) and 16GB is 20gbps or GDDR6x, for $349 It would be a great card.For $349 with 16GB of ram, the performance per watt, with fairly compact models with a single 8 pin? I'd buy it.
If It's the full AD106(36SM) and 16GB is 20gbps or GDDR6x, for $349 It would be a great card.
I would also buy It.
I never said It would happen, but It would certainly be nice.It's a pure fantasy though.
In my most optimistic take, NVidia drops both the Ti card $50 by July for the 16GB launch, making it $450.
But I'm not really an optimist. I actually expect it will still launch at $500 regardless how much the 8GB version is neglected.
Maybe a really good surprise N32 launch by AMD could shake things, up, but I'm not optimistic for that either.
AMD is no better. They follow them like a weak shadow on a cloudy day. They both seem to have embraced the boom bust model, where the only one that suffers is the consumer. A.I. is just the latest boom, they'll find another if that goes bust.I never said It would happen, but It would certainly be nice.
N32 could be a pretty decent performer, but I don't think It will be that cheap.
We would be really lucky If It was priced at $499.
It looks to me like Nvidia doesn't really care about gaming that much anymore, they have other segments with way better margins.
Last time TPU did PCIe gen testing, it was only like 4% between 3.0 and 4.0. But I don't think he tested very long runs, and certainly didn't have this latest crop of 9th gen console ports. Possible the hit is big enough to matter moving forward.I would really like to see a review of 4060Ti against 3060 12GB but with PCIe Gen 3.0 for both cards. I have the feeling that 8x PCIe lines on the 4060Ti will have a extra negative impact in games that need more than 8GB Vram.
It looks to me like Nvidia doesn't really care about gaming that much anymore, they have other segments with way better margins.
Let's just do VRAM:
8GB GDDR6 costs ~$27, yet NV charges $100. So they could easily shave $50 off the card and still have 85% VRAM profit. 85% profit won't be "putting anyone out of business".
Just curious, was that test of x8 or x16?Last time TPU did PCIe gen testing, it was only like 4% between 3.0 and 4.0. But I don't think he tested very long runs, and certainly didn't have this latest crop of 9th gen console ports. Possible the hit is big enough to matter moving forward.
It looks to me like Nvidia doesn't really care about gaming that much anymore, they have other segments with way better margins.
Here is the scaling for the 6600XTJust curious, was that test of x8 or x16?
There's also outrage under every YouTube review and MLID's sales people quotes all point to them seeing little interest and expecting little.Though I don't know how many will think it's unacceptable. They may still end up moving large numbers of 4060 Ti cards. We really can't judge by our/forum outrage.
And how does this change what I said? Nvidia cares about gaming because they released Ad102 or something?Tell that to 4090 buyers...
Gaming segment is no longer the main source of revenue, but It's also not a negligible amount of money.
I think you will agree, that this segment is no longer the main focus for Nvidia.
Exactly this. It isn't hard to understand.The main source of gripes is simply pricing, not that the product is bad.
I also don't believe that they will just accept these low sales permanently. However, I also don't think that there is any panic, with how well they are selling to the business market.Also just because it isn't the biggest revenue stream, doesn't mean they are giving up on it.
I think that we need to distinguish between the engineers and senior management. I'm sure that there are a lot of engineers with a ton of passion for gaming, but the decision to set these prices and to downgrade each tier wasn't made by them, but by senior management.The main source of gripes is simply pricing, not that the product is bad.
Anyone else feel like the +$100 for adding 8GB of VRAM on the 4060 Ti 16GB is a very Apple move?
If it was an Apple move, people would actually buy it.Anyone else feel like the +$100 for adding 8GB of VRAM on the 4060 Ti 16GB is a very Apple move?
The main source of gripes is simply pricing, not that the product is bad.
As someone very smart once said, there are no bad GPUs, just bad price.Exactly this. It isn't hard to understand.