Yeah vid's already downloaded.I'm sure people have the evidence saved before he inevitably nukes it, he lost the game.
After June 3rd, who will have the bigger historic meltdown, MLID or Jimbo after Computex 2019?You act like he'll care. But here's how it'll go, if he acknowledges it all:
"Some jokesters sent me faked slides. But it was in agreement with what other sources had told me so I made a video about it."
hard to beat Jimbo, his zen2chart.png was topkekAfter June 3rd, who will have the bigger historic meltdown, MLID or Jimbo after Computex 2019?
It's the leaker wars. Grab some fake popcorn, watch the nukes with tinted glasses.Damn, what's this drama.
This aged poorly. 🤣MLID's apparently been able to present genuine AMD NDA-protected slides for some time. So my advice is to 100% disregard all his written comments and focus just on the 3rd party original slides.
Zen 5 original slides so far has been confirmed 100% true.
Thread just got updated with the full email chain.
He was probably salivating so hard after watching the pic LOLThread just got updated with the full email chain.
Truly amazing how easy it was to get MLID to bit the bait.
The point of the setup was to prove MLID does not validate his sources. You should understand how important this is more than anyone around here, as you are probably the forum member with the highest standards for the members of the press (so high that you consider most of them incompetent). Moreover, the moral quality of those who played the prank is mostly irrelevant for the subject at hand. The important message here is MLID is susceptible to this type of fake seeds from any number of malicious people, which is probably true for a number of his past leaks as well.so in a way they just confirm that they are a bunch of deperatly envious badfaithers who are chasing some cheap fame
The point of the setup was to prove MLID does not validate his sources. You should understand how important this is more than anyone around here, as you are probably the forum member with the highest standards for the members of the press (so high that you consider most of them incompetent). Moreover, the moral quality of those who played the prank is mostly irrelevant for the subject at hand. The important message here is MLID is susceptible to this type of fake seeds from any number of malicious people, which is probably true for a number of his past leaks as well.
The same thing happened to Jim from AdoredTV, and just because we never knew the folks who played the prank on him does not change the outcome of that fake leak and how desperately he fought to defend it even against seasoned journalists. If you don't have direct access to confidential information then you must ALWAYS validate your sources, especially if you own a monetized YT video channel and have the habit of plastering watermarks all over corporate slides you receive via email. The watermark is not just a way of preventing attribution from other sources, it's also a seal of approval - you indirectly vouch for the slide's authenticity authenticity.
Well, how different is this new MLID's email slide from those older MLID's Zen 5-related ones? I haven't checked them side-by-size but they both present nearly identical info, right?This aged poorly. 🤣
Probably not that different (the fake slide was based on known info already), but what’s more egregious is that MLID not only quoted a fake source and marked it as “high confidence” but he did so while misrepresenting the fake source entirely. If you compare what was said in the emails said to MLID and what he wrote, you’ll notice not only did he create two sources out of one but there’s extra info in his video that the fake source doesn’t even mention, which indicates he’s manipulating and/or fabricating info to satisfy his own agenda.Well, how different is this new MLID's email slide from those older MLID's Zen 5-related ones? I haven't checked them side-by-size but they both present nearly identical info, right?
Whataboutism is a very poor strategy. We can criticize other leakers and MLID independently, although it seems to me you're more interested in provoking an emotional response from Kepler than engaging in honest debate. Whatever your reasons for this approach, keep in mind this thread is about MLID and his status of legitimate source of information.it s not like someone here in this mob was caught off guard by RDNA3 final numbers with his previous claims being at odd with the actual results.