At least I dont go around bragging about how "unbiased" I am. Your posts speak for themselves.You know what I meant. Don't think I'm biased because I give Intel a hard time. And who are you to talk about bias?
At least I dont go around bragging about how "unbiased" I am. Your posts speak for themselves.
So what? Clockspeed "is what it is" however it was obtained. Do you thing a game has some code in it that says "Oh, that is 14nm, an old process, I am going to downclock it to match Ryzen"?
Man, this is some serious word spinning business. I'm surprised people even try to meaningfully respond to these kinds posts of yours. Strange, because I've seen you trying to actually argue before.Thunder 57 said:
. So don't think I'm giving Intel a hard time because I'm biased.
Man, this is some serious word spinning business. I'm surprised people even try to meaningfully respond to these kinds posts of yours. Strange, because I've seen you trying to actually argue before.
Of course not you
Yeah well, still nobody showed me how a 9900KS would sustain 4.7 GHz ACT at 127 Watts during any meaningful workload, thus being rather impressive. I believe Tech Jesus before I believe Zucker2k.LoL, very early morning post and all. I kind of figured. Anyway, should probably get back on topic before anyone has to remind us .
Well I guess it depends on how high the reviewer is...the 9900ks might be a good bit faster than the 50% more cores 3900x or it might be a good bit slower...on the same workload.
Yes it can go up to 180W it can even go higher than that,do you know why?Because it can hit 5Ghz and even more.
Man, you didn't even look at your picture before you tried to convince the thread with a cherry picked behcnmark, that a 9900KS can be slower and faster than the 3900X in the same workload depending on the power limit set. I mean.... what? On the right side you showed us that a 9900KS with PL2 set to 255W doesn't even come anywhere close to the 3900X at stock, and on the left side you put a completely irrelevant x264 pass bench, where even a stock 8700K beats the 3900X for some reason. Has nothing to do with 9900KS power limits.
Absolutely. It also didn't make any sense in light of what he himself wrote.Pass one is usually very thread limited. Not to mention that benchmark is ancient. I like to think of it this way. Just replace "They hear what they want to hear" with "They see what they want to see".