Log in
Register
Menu
Install the app
Install
Home
Featured
Forums
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
N
name99
Senior member
Messages
423
Solutions
1
Featured content
0
Profile views
179
Reaction score
317
Points
136
Joined
Sep 11, 2010
Last seen
Yesterday at 5:31 PM
Find
Find content
Find all content by name99
Find all threads by name99
Latest activity
Postings
Featured content
About
Trophies
N
name99
reacted to
roger_k's post
in the thread
Discussion
Apple Silicon SoC thread
with
Like
.
Or maybe it's just difficult to make good IPC increases if one already leads the market in IPC by a large margin. I don't think the...
Yesterday at 5:31 PM
N
name99
reacted to
xiewe3wq's post
in the thread
Discussion
Apple Silicon SoC thread
with
Like
.
The narrative that Apple is stagnating has been going around since before the M1 was released. What happened in those 5 years? Did other...
Yesterday at 5:28 PM
N
name99
reacted to
Mopetar's post
in the thread
Discussion
Apple Silicon SoC thread
with
Like
.
Considering that Apple released M4 only 8 months after M3 and it's more than just a port over to a different node, I think any...
Yesterday at 5:26 PM
N
name99
reacted to
The Hardcard's post
in the thread
Discussion
Apple Silicon SoC thread
with
Like
.
Exactly, so why a discussion about a problem at Apple when we don’t know what it is or even if there is one? It is weird to worry about...
Yesterday at 5:24 PM
N
name99
reacted to
reggie_fils_aime's post
in the thread
Discussion
Apple Silicon SoC thread
with
Like
.
No, but don't you see, it's the same kind of mediocre regardless of AC power. That means Apple is doomed!
Yesterday at 5:22 PM
N
name99
reacted to
The Hardcard's post
in the thread
Discussion
Apple Silicon SoC thread
with
Like
.
Or they have clues, but finishing this is what’s on the agenda now. After all, they have clearly leapt into uncharted territory with a...
Yesterday at 5:20 PM
N
name99
reacted to
SpudLobby's post
in the thread
Discussion
Apple Silicon SoC thread
with
Like
.
Fwiw geekerwan seems to be measuring now with internal Apple APIs. There are other figures putting total M4 power at 11W which is what I...
Monday at 8:02 PM
N
name99
replied to the thread
Discussion
Apple Silicon SoC thread
.
I used to think this, until I investigated closely the exact hardware present in both. Now I think "unification GPU and NPU" is...
May 25, 2024
N
name99
replied to the thread
Discussion
Apple Silicon SoC thread
.
This is a business decision, not a technical decision. It may stay the same indefinitely, implemented as good enough for human factors...
May 25, 2024
N
name99
replied to the thread
Discussion
Apple Silicon SoC thread
.
That's to multiple devices. I believe the Blackwell chip-to-chip link is 1.8TB/s so still slightly behind Apple. (Of course to be fair...
May 25, 2024
N
name99
reacted to
Doug S's post
in the thread
Discussion
Apple Silicon SoC thread
with
Like
.
See I don't see it as a problem if a chip is able to use a lot of power for single thread. If I have a single thread load, and a CPU...
May 25, 2024
N
name99
replied to the thread
Discussion
Apple Silicon SoC thread
.
So then what are we fighting about? I reacted to the claim "Isn’t autovectorization still pretty shoddy for SVE?" by saying "no it's...
May 23, 2024
N
name99
replied to the thread
Discussion
Apple Silicon SoC thread
.
You can read the full set of tweets here: and assume I am wrong. OR you can actually understand what I am saying, which is equivalent...
May 23, 2024
N
name99
replied to the thread
Discussion
Apple Silicon SoC thread
.
I'm curious. Smart people at LLVM, for example, have been working on Linalg for 4+ years...
May 23, 2024
N
name99
replied to the thread
Discussion
Apple Silicon SoC thread
.
Like I said, now we are getting into semantics about what counts as "pretty shoddy". I'm frustrated that people (frequently the same...
May 23, 2024
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
RESOURCES
Advertising
Cookies Policies
Privacy
Term & Conditions
FOLLOW
Facebook
Twitter
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
sale-70-410-exam
|
Exam-200-125-pdf
|
we-sale-70-410-exam
|
hot-sale-70-410-exam
|
Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps
|
Dumps-98-363-exams-date
|
Certs-200-125-date
|
Dumps-300-075-exams-date
|
hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book
|
Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam
|
Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?
|
hot-sale-book-200-125-book
|
Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam
|
Dumps-210-260-exams-date
|
Download-200-125-Exam-PDF
|
Exam-Description-300-101-dumps
|
Certs-300-101-date
|
Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam
|
Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps
|
Exam-Description-200-125-dumps
|
Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam
|
hot-sale-book-210-260-book
|
Dumps-200-901-exams-date
|
Certs-200-901-date
|
Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps
|
Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam
|
Certs-CSSLP-date
|
100%-Pass-70-383-Exams
|
Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions
|
100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions
|
Dumps-300-135-exams-date
|
Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams
|
Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam
|
Download-300-070-Exam-PDF
|
Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam
|
100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams
|
100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions
|
Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date
|
Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps
|
Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps
|
Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date
|
2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam
|
100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions
|
Pass-4A0-100-Exam
|
Latest-4A0-100-Questions
|
Dumps-98-365-exams-date
|
2017-Latest-98-365-Exam
|
100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams
|
2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam
|
Dumps-200-355-exams-date
|
2017-Latest-300-320-Exam
|
Pass-300-101-Exam
|
100%-Pass-300-115-Exams
|
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/
|
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/
|