Elon Musk now owns 9.2% of twitter...update.. will soon be the sole owner as Board of Directors accepts his purchase offer

Page 336 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
14,586
9,970
136
Eh... You might think that, but let me share an anecdote I saw the other day: I saw someone talking about asking if it was wise to drop nearly $50k cash on a 7-person SUV that their wife wanted but didn't really need. In fact, he said he'd be happy with just a Camry. But, it seems like he wouldn't exactly hold a conversation with his spouse to discuss pros and cons of dropping so much money on such an unnecessary purchase.
More proof marketing works. Still that is more being susceptible to marketing than a true con.
 
Reactions: Brainonska511

uallas5

Golden Member
Jun 3, 2005
1,433
1,559
136
starting to look like CT deliveries are on pause
I read that too, though I can't find the article right now. It said they're reducing hours and shortening shifts, even at the CT plant. I thought there were 1000's of pre-orders for CT to be filled though?

The layoff rumors have proven true, with Tesla laying off more than 10%, up to %14, of its workforce worldwide.


 

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
14,586
9,970
136
Which kid got hit by a Tesla using FSD?
Plenty of test videos showing it'll happy mow over a kid. The bigger point is that all other road users can't "opt out" of FSD when some Elon fanboy chooses to opt in.

This systems need to have universal testing and quality control requirements before they are unleashed onto the public, but obviously that might be too much burden on one of the top killing industries in the US.
 

Brovane

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2001
5,355
1,538
136
Plenty of test videos showing it'll happy mow over a kid. The bigger point is that all other road users can't "opt out" of FSD when some Elon fanboy chooses to opt in.

This systems need to have universal testing and quality control requirements before they are unleashed onto the public, but obviously that might be too much burden on one of the top killing industries in the US.

Looking at the test from April 8 2024 with the latest version of the software, I really fail to see how a human driver would do any better. They literally pulled the mannequin right out in front of the car with almost zero time to react. There is plenty of things you can find fault with for Tesla FSD other than blatant crap by the Dawn Project.

I do agree that better testing needs to be done by a government agency on any of these driver assist features from any manufacturer.
 
Reactions: cytg111

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
20,400
5,150
136
I agree. Most people paying 15K for a car addon, on an already high priced car, should be sophisticated enough to do some research and thought.
I would guess that for most it was like any other fashion accessory or status symbol, the value is in displaying it or telling others you have it.
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
23,247
12,880
136
I would guess that for most it was like any other fashion accessory or status symbol, the value is in displaying it or telling others you have it.
Hell no. One of my biggest dreams is to nap in the car while getting from A to B.
 
Reactions: iRONic

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,127
48,193
136
Hell no. One of my biggest dreams is to nap in the car while getting from A to B.
Yes, I am very confident that automated driving that is safer than human driving is technologically achievable and when it is achieved it will be a huge benefit in both labor savings, efficiency, and lives saved.

The problem here is that Tesla has very obviously not achieved that at this time.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
69,079
26,989
136
Hell no. One of my biggest dreams is to nap in the car while getting from A to B.
Yep. To me, self driving means just that; other than telling the car the destination, the driver can take a nap. Anything less and I want full control. I can't imagine anything more stressful than spending my entire time behind the wheel wondering if the autopilot is going to f' up each particular situation. It would be like teaching a teenager to drive every time you got in the car.
 
Mar 11, 2004
23,089
5,566
146
Some lucky ones spent as little as $4k on FSD? (Can't remember the low water mark, their autonomous driving schemes have undergone many sales revisions.) IIRC FSD was never transferable, except Tesla occasionally did carve-outs to juice select new vehicle sales.

Whatever happened to Elon suggesting he would raise FSD pricing into the mid 5 figures because that's how valuable robotaxis are to their owners? But yeah charging just $99 monthly for FSD seems like a big fuck you to the paying beta testers. Unless it's just a temporary ploy for marketing (and even then), it doesn't seem to make sense.

How we should feel about people falling for obvious cons really depends on the con and the victims. For example, we should have sympathy for people who get wrecked by (used) auto loans at usury rates even if they're flunking the very basics of personal finance.

I think they're supposed to announce their robotaxi service soon, I'm guessing he's doing it to be able to fluff the numbers. But then, why he wouldn't just offer free FSD if people opted in to let their cars be part of the robotaxi service, I dunno. Maybe its just to juice sales prior to the robotaxi service to fluff numbers about potential installed base and then fluff numbers of how many people are using FSD.
 

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
20,400
5,150
136
Hell no. One of my biggest dreams is to nap in the car while getting from A to B.
To each his own. I would neve use it or pay for it, though I know people who would buy it just because it's a new gadget.
If Tesla really wants to push FSD they need to give it flashing lights and sound effects, with a lot of buttons that do little or nothing.
 

jmagg

Platinum Member
Nov 21, 2001
2,025
363
126
FSD imo, is nowhere near ready for prime time, so for myself, baby sitting that function is dumb. I will say that newer radar functions (blind side alert etc) will be beneficial to the many distracted drivers on the road.
 

Stokely

Golden Member
Jun 5, 2017
1,615
2,072
136
As an aside, I don't think humans driving those dipshit penis-enhancer trucks that seem to be everywhere are going to avoid kids either...or even see them. They might feel the bump. Hell I'm 6'4" and I can barely look over the hoods on some of them. Add in texting that every moron does and I doubt "AI" can do worse.

My solution has been to work from home so I don't need to drive much Stay away from both distracted morons and killer robot cars....more importantly, avoid the "open and collaborative" open office plan that my company went to, don't get me started...
 

Dave_5k

Golden Member
May 23, 2017
1,594
3,108
136
Yes, I am very confident that automated driving that is safer than human driving is technologically achievable and when it is achieved it will be a huge benefit in both labor savings, efficiency, and lives saved.
While I agree, I see the bigger problem in the United States (even more than the engineering challenge), is the legal challenge.

Lawyers will work to destroy such automated driving - going after everyone involved in such software for every accident (even if such accidents are far fewer than human driving), and likely collecting into class action suits. Although I have been surprised by how few the lawsuits have been against Tesla, so far.
 

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
13,070
7,998
136
While I agree, I see the bigger problem in the United States (even more than the engineering challenge), is the legal challenge.

Lawyers will work to destroy such automated driving - going after everyone involved in such software for every accident (even if such accidents are far fewer than human driving), and likely collecting into class action suits. Although I have been surprised by how few the lawsuits have been against Tesla, so far.

I have the opposite fear. That lawyers will work to impose laws on everyone else so as to enable the self-driving cars to work at all. The environment will be remodelled to suit the automated cars and the laws changed to make it hard to hold the corporations that build them, or those who buy and use them, to account for the damage they cause.

That's what happened when cars themselves were first developed (hence the introduction of the absurdity that are 'jaywalking' laws). It's what computer tech in cars has so far been used for (e.g. tricking emissions-tests).
Self driving cars will probably never work in the environment as it is, so they'll try and change that environment to suit corporate interests. And because self-driving won't have the small barrier to adoption that human driven cars have (i.e. being able to muster the minimal level of competence the current US driving test requires) the car-lobby will increase in numbers and the problems caused by it will get worse.
 
Reactions: Zorba

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,127
48,193
136
While I agree, I see the bigger problem in the United States (even more than the engineering challenge), is the legal challenge.

Lawyers will work to destroy such automated driving - going after everyone involved in such software for every accident (even if such accidents are far fewer than human driving), and likely collecting into class action suits. Although I have been surprised by how few the lawsuits have been against Tesla, so far.
Oh yes, definitely. If automated cars drop driving fatalities 90% but those remaining 10% are negligent/horrifying/whatever we're going to have a big problem.
 
Reactions: Brovane and cytg111

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
23,247
12,880
136
One of my biggest dreams is to have a non-car dependent society so I can nap in a high speed train to wherever I'm going.
Ill take personal transport instead of over crowded disease sharing community transits any day thanks .
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |